Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Gulfside Casino v. MS Riverboat Council, et al
as 07-60807
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GULFSIDE CASINO PARTNERSHIP
Defendant - Appellant:
MISSISSIPPI RIVERBOAT COUNCIL, UNITE HERE, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and others
ConocoPhillips Company v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 351
as 2:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Company
Defendant:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 351
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Artz et al v. Mississippi River Boat Council et al
as 1:2007cv01006
Plaintiff:
Billie Jo Artz, Daniel Kudrav and Inetra Wright
Defendant:
Mississippi River Boat Council, Unite Here, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Fanning et al v. Merrick et al
as 4:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael R Fanning, Board of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Pipeline Employers Health and Welfare Fund and Board of Trustees of the Hoisting and Portable Engineers Local 178 Apprentice Fund
Defendant:
John Merrick, David B Phillips, Carol Merrick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fanning et al v. Fennell et al
as 3:2007cv00632
Plaintiff:
Michael R Fanning, Board of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Pipeline Employers Health and Welfare Fund and Board of Trustees of the Hoisting and Portable Engineers Local 178 Apprentice Fund
Defendant:
Alan K Fennell, Alan K Fennell, U-Con Construction Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Gulfside Casino Partnership v. Mississippi Riverboat Council et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gulfside Casino Partnership and Gulfside Casino Partnership
Defendant:
Mississippi Riverboat Council, Mississippi Riverboat Council, UNITE HERE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
