Cases 21 - 30 of 496
Choyce v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Clifton Choyce
Defendant:
Jason E Williams, Robert Keller, J Soqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Kent Fitch
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Krueger v. Arledge et al
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Defendant:
Roy Wade Arledge, Texas Board of Pardons & Parole, Central Division, Austin, TX and TDCJ-ID Institutional Division, Huntsville, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harmon v. Coleman et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
R. Coleman, Barbara Kent, Rachael Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viral DRM LLC v. Frank Kent Chevrolet LLC
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Defendant:
Frank Kent Chevrolet LLC and Frank Kent Country, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Wylie v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kent Wylie
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Phan v. American Family Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kent Vu Phan
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Phan v. American Family Insurance Company
as 4:2023mc00006
Defendant:
Kent Vu Phan and American Family Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
