Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Slade v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2008cv00077
Plaintiff: Benton T. Slade
Defendant: Crane Co., Garlock, Inc., Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Collier v. ITT Industrial, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01275
Plaintiff: Michael Otis Collier
Defendant: ITT Industrial, Inc., FMC Corp., Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Beckman v. RSC Equipment REntal, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00139
Plaintiff: Billy Beckman
Defendant: RSC Equipment REntal, Inc., Terex Corporation, Terex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bland et al v. Zurn Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01131
Plaintiff: Shirley Bland and Henry Bland, Jr.
Defendant: Zurn Industries, Inc., Riley Power, Inc., Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ball v. H-C Auto Electric Co. et al
as 1:2007cv00063
Plaintiff: Morris Ball
Defendant: Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company, Crane Co., Terex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDaniel v. H-C Auto Electric Co. et al
as 1:2007cv00064
Plaintiff: Bobby Earl McDaniel
Defendant: Mississippi Rubber & Specialty Company, Crane Co., Terex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adame et al v. Terex Corporation
as 4:2007cv00589
Plaintiff: Armando Adame, Armando Adame, Armando Adame and others
Defendant: Terex Corporation, Terex Corporation and Terex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?