Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth v. Sebelius et al
as 4:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda Solis, Timothy Geithner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EEOC:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Huang v. Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor
as 4:2012cv00035
Petitioner:
Dongsheng Huang
Respondent:
Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor v. Houston Telemessaging Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02065
Defendant:
Houston Telemessaging Group, Inc., Michael Allen Truelock and Houston Telemessaging Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Beemer v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
Scott Eugene Beemer
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey , U.S. Department Of Justice , U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Premium Well Drilling, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 5:2008cv00610
Plaintiff:
Premium Well Drilling, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kulik v. U.S. Department of Labor et al
as 4:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Kulik
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Elaine L Chao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Geer v. U.S. Department of Labor et al
as 5:2007cv00456
Plaintiff:
Justin Geer
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Department of Veterans Affairs and John D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
