Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-50971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Travis Miller
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, U.S. Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Parks v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Devon Parks
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Antony J. Blinken, Philip S. Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rangel v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
Javier Rangel
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Director Timothy M Wiesnet, Secretary Antony J. Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
