Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Westbrook v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00246
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Westbrook, Margie Westbrook, Margie Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
O. C. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Shelia Fancher, Juanita Yvonne Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holston v. Toikus Westbrook, M.D.
as 1:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
Edgie T. Holston
Defendant:
Toikus Westbrook, M.D.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
O. C. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Shelia Fancher, Floyd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 2.23 Acres in Smith County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00346
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant:
2.23 Acres in Smith County, Mississippi, Dale Westbrook, Unknown Persons Having Interest In Said Property and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Continental Casualty Company v. Pruett et al
as 4:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
Linda R. Pruett, Clemmie Cleveland, Robert Sandifer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Westbrook v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00214
Petitioner:
Larry Westbrook
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Westbrook
as 2:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lashaunda S. Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Westbrook v. Payne et al
as 1:2007cv00497
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Westbrook
Defendant:
George H. Payne, Jr. and Donald A. Cabana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
