Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Honeywell International Inc
as 4:2018cv00475
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc
Plaintiff:
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
AlarMax Distributors, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mc00021
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc
Plaintiff:
AlarMax Distributors Inc
Respondent:
Para Systems Inc
Cumberland Systems LLC v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 6:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Cumberland Systems LLC
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Honeywell International Inc v. Rhino Linings Corporation
as 3:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc
Defendant:
Rhino Linings Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Rhino Linings Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Code Corporation v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Defendant:
Hand Held Products, Inc., Intermec IP Corp., Intermec Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The Code Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Honeywell International Inc v. MEK Chemical Corporation
as 3:2017cv01663
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc
Defendant:
MEK Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Honeywell International Inc v MEK Chemical Corporation
as 3:2017cv01390
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc
Defendant:
MEK Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
