Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Tipps v. Wathen et al
as 7:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kerry Tipps
Defendant:
Richard Wathen, Charles Horsley, Major Eastep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jabri J McCullough
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Richard E Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. Boyle et al
as 7:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Tito Lee Salazar
Defendant:
Joseph Boyle, T Phillips, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Howard v. Robert Eason, et al
as 15-10082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX JARAUN HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EASON, MICHAEL UPSHAW, PAUL MORALES and others
Willis Horsley, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-11366
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIS ROYCE HORSLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Muniz v. Wathen et al
as 7:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jacob Muniz
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Richard Wathen, Charles R Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis v. Livingston et al
as 7:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Arturo Solis
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Oliver J Bell, Frank Hoke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Eason et al
as 7:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Defendant:
Robert Eason, Michael Upshaw, Paul Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horsley v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv02898
Petitioner:
Willis Royce Horsley, Jr
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vogel v. Livingston et al
as 7:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Scott Vogel
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, C Horsley, Sgt Frenich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
