Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Pena v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00223
Plaintiff:
Oscar Pena
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardona v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00218
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Cardona
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejeda v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
Joe Tejeda
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mijorez v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jose Mijorez
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Queen v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Joseph Queen
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arispe v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
Robert Arispe
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marez v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00219
Plaintiff:
Refugio Marez
Defendant:
John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Shabazz v. Dhirajlal Patel, et al
as 11-10833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS SHABAZZ, also known as Curley Taylor Rollins, also known as Curtis Taylor Rollins, Curtis T. Rollins
Defendant - Appellee:
DHIRAJLAL PATEL, Medical Doctor, TOSHA JAMES, Bill Clements H.S. Medical Administrator, STEVEN W. WAUSON, Lieutenant, Supervisor of Correctional Officers and others
Shabazz v. Patel et al
as 2:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Curtis Shabazz
Defendant:
Dhirajlal SM Patel, Tosha James, Steven W Wauson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Taylor v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 11-10664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY DESHAN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H ADAMS, Warden II, JAMIE L BAKER, Assistance Warden, JOHNNY F. SANDOVAL, COV Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
