Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
ComCam International, Inc. v. Monitronics International, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00799
Plaintiff: ComCam International, Inc.
Defendant: Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ComCam International, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
as 2:2013cv00795
Plaintiff: ComCam International, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Consolidated Defendant: Monitronics International, Inc., Lifeshield Security LLC, Protect America Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: David Folsom and Scott Woloson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Patriot American, L.L.C. et al v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03083
Plaintiff: Patriot American, L.L.C. and Wendell A. Jacobson
Defendant: Monitronics International, Inc. , Monitronics Funding LP , Monitronics Security LP and others
Counter_claimant: Monitronics Funding LP , Ascent Capital Group, Inc. , Monitronics Security LP and others
Counter_defendant: Wendell A. Jacobson and Patriot American, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey et al v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00158
Plaintiff: Mel Bailey and The Estate of Marie H. Bailey
Defendant: Monitronics International, Inc., Kingdom Security International, Rexford Alarm Service and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Monitronics International, Inc. v. Paradox Security Systems, Ltd.
as 3:2008mc00033
Plaintiff: Monitronics International, Inc. and Monitronics International, Inc.
Defendant: Paradox Security Systems, Ltd., ADT Security Services Inc, Digital Security Controls, Ltd. and others
Monitronics International, Inc. v. Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P.
as 3:2007mc00044
Plaintiff: Monitronics International, Inc., Monitronics International, Inc., Monitronics International, Inc. and others
Defendant: Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?