Cases 31 - 40 of 10,390
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coppola v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Coppola and Iron Thunderhorse
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01231
Petitioner:
Charles Larry Hunnicutt
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nadeau v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ryan Nadeau
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
