Cases 31 - 40 of 197
Gomez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Tamara Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kyle v. Saiz et al
as 5:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Yvette Kyle
Defendant:
Lawrence P Saiz, B Sigala, M Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamas v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv04095
Plaintiff:
Tamara Tamas
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Walker v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2021cv04058
Plaintiff:
Tamara Walker
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Snell v. Sollows
as 4:2021cv01256
Plaintiff:
Tamara Snell
Defendant:
William E. Gene Sollows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Williams v. Greenwood Motor Lines Inc. dba R&L Carriers et al
as 4:2021cv02066
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines Inc. dba R&L Carriers and Christopher Lee Zatezalo
Plaintiff:
Tamara Lavon Williams and Mike Raymond Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keitt et al v. Landstar Inway, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02060
Defendant:
Jorge Alberto Jacquez, Sr, Landstar Inway, Inc. and Simon Abaka Anthony
Plaintiff:
Tamara Keitt and Rosemary Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Saul
as 4:2021cv02192
Plaintiff:
Tamara N. Johnson
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2021cv00712
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tamara Renee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
