Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Becker Professional Development Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00286
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Becker Professional Development Corporation , Cabela's, Inc. , Charming Shoppes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lodsys Group, LLC v. GMCI Internet Operations, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00291
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
GMCI Internet Operations, Inc. , Playboy Enterprises, Inc. , RK Netmedia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Dell, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00289
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Dell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Foster and Smith, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Foster and Smith, Inc., Recreational Equipment, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lodsys Group, LLC v. AVG Technologies USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
AVG Technologies USA, Inc. , GFI Software, Inc., Kaspersky Lab, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Rosetta Stone, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Rosetta Stone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lodsys, LLC v. Brother International Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00090
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility LLC, Brother International Corporation, Trend Micro Incorporated and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Shop MA, Inc., GFI Software, Inc., Michael G. Karr d/b/a Shovelmate and others
Counter Claimant:
Rosetta Stone, Inc., Rovio Mobile Ltd, Electronic Arts Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Pete Peterson
Counter Defendant:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Lodsys, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Electronic Frontier Foundation and Application Developers Alliance
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
