Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 198
Lopez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02476
Plaintiff: Phillip Lopez, Marshall Rouser, Rick Alfred and others
Defendant: Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marquis McNeelyIn re: Marquis McNeely
as 22-60309
Petitioner: In re: Marquis Howard McNeely
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tate v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01678
Petitioner: Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Davis
as 22-20205
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Marqui Lamon Davis
Tate v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00651
Petitioner: Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jackson
as 22-10111
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Brandon Marquise Jackson, also known as Brandon Marquis Jackson
Tate v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00400
Petitioner: Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. C.R. England
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff: Chris Brandon Garcia
Defendant: C.R. England and Marquis Dequan Monday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00055
Petitioner: Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent: TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?