Cases 41 - 50 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Bridges, et al v. Houston Methodist Hospital et al.
as 4:2021cv01774
Defendant:
Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital, Houston Methodist Hospital and The Houston Methodist Hospital doing business as The Methodist Hospital System
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bridges, Bob Nevens, Maria Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sanchez v. Methodist Hospital
as 3:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Sanchez
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Adames v. NueHealth Management Svc
as 21-10974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Micaela Adames, Michelle
Defendant / Appellee:
NueHealth Management Services, L.L.C., formerly known as Nueterra Healthcare Management, L.L.C., doing business as NueHealth and MetDalSpi, L.L.C., doing business as Methodist Hospital for Surgery
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.