Cases 41 - 50 of 417
Starling v. Roofing Masters Network, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02406
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Starling
Defendant:
Roofing Masters Network, LLC and Oscar Navarro
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Navarro Garcia v. Garland
as 22-60552
Petitioner:
Francisco Navarro Garcia, Rosa Isela De La Fuete De Hoyos and Demian Francisco Navarro De La Fuente
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
4405 Navarro Owner LLC v. Crestmarc VPC Autumn Park, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
4405 Navarro Owner LLC
Defendant:
Crestmarc VPC Autumn Park, LLC and Greg Cason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Navarro v. ISS Action, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Santos Francis Murcia Navarro
Defendant:
ISS Action, Inc. and Rudy Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Navarro v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 4:2022cv02494
Plaintiff:
Jesus Navarro
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Noble Capital Texas Real Estate Income Fund, LP v. Newman et al
as 1:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
US Capital/Noble Capital Texas Real Estate Income Fund, LP and Noble Capital Texas Real Estate Income Fund LP
Defendant:
Jadon Newman, Chris Ragland, Romney Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Navarro v. City of Bryan
as 4:2022cv02047
Plaintiff:
Albert Navarro
Defendant:
City of Bryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Hinojosa
as 22-10584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alfredo Navarro Hinojosa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
