Cases 41 - 50 of 3,568
Stelly et al v. Perez Miranda et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Stelly and DAnielle Stelly
Defendant:
Noe Perez Miranda, Transporte Y Adunas Espinoza and Trisura Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Israel Perez Law PLLC v. Applied Industrial Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Israel Perez Law, PLLC and Israel Perez Law PLLC
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., Sean Boerner and Applied Industrial Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
USA v. Perez
as 24-10099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Perez
Miranda Perez v. Garland
as 24-60061
Petitioner:
Adriana Elisa Miranda Perez and Geidy Yadira Gomez Miranda
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Perez et al v. Price Energy Services, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Saul Perez, Everardo Perez and Isaiah Perez
Defendant:
Price Energy Services, LLC, Edmund H. "Beau&q Price and Edmund H (Beau) Price
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Adame et al v. Cactus Drilling Company LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rolando Adame, Adan Chavez, Victor Manuel Perez Barragan and others
Defendant:
Cactus Drilling Company LLC and Christopher Eugnen Akin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-60057
Petitioner:
Pedro Perez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Espinoza v. Herrera et al
as 7:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Christian Espinoza
Defendant:
Angel Herrera and Julia Lopez Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
