Cases 51 - 60 of 862
OKERSON v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW OKERSON
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Smith v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al
as 3:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Mary Martha Smith
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips NV, Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CTPrimes, LLC v. Philips Medical Systems (CLEVELAND) INC et al
as 6:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
CTPrimes, LLC
Defendant:
Philips Medical Systems (CLEVELAND) INC, Philips India Ltd, Philips Medical Systems Technologies LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Reeves et al v. MAOF America, LLC d/b/a AgriTech
as 9:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Robert Reeves and Howell Howard
Defendant:
MAOF America, LLC d/b/a AgriTech
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Dolan v. Penske Automotive Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Dolan
Defendant:
Penske Automotive Group Inc, The Around the Clock Freightliner Group LLC d/b/a Premier Truck Group, The Around The Clock Freightliner Group LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
FILING ERROR
as 6:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
CTPrimes, LLC
Defendant:
Philips Medical Systems (CLEVELAND) INC, Philips India Ltd, philips Medical Systems Technologies LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
FILING ERROR
as 6:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
CTPrimes, LLC
Defendant:
Philips Medical Systems (CLEVELAND) INC, Philips India Ltd, philips Medical Systems Technologies LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Moncure v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lakandra M. Moncure
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Direct Link International LLC v. MV Sea Train et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Direct Link International LLC
Defendant:
MV Sea Train, Sea Bridge Shipping Management Co., Ltd., Hongkong New Silk Road Shipping Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Innovation Products, Inc. v. M/V Sea Train et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Innovation Products, Inc.
Defendant:
MV Sea Train, Sea Bridge Shipping Management Co., Ltd., Hongkong New Silk Road Shipping Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
