Cases 51 - 60 of 146
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2019cv01369
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
T'Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earle v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 1:2019cv00104
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Parole Commission and DC Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Vernon Norman Earle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cordier v. U.S. Pollock
as 1:2018cv01594
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dewayne Cordier
Defendant:
U S P Pollock, Warden Johnson, Officer Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malachowski v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2018cv01541
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Marcel Malachowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campa-Quintanilla v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv01368
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Campa-Quintanilla
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haynes v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01356
Plaintiff:
Steven Haynes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Dept of Justice and Federal Prison Camp Pensacola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Lopez et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00931
Plaintiff:
Jhair Generoso Paternina-Christopher, Hernando Antionio Jimenez-Ortiz, Jose Maria Barrios-Ipuana and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jefferson B Sessions, III and Loretta E Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Birkett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv01425
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Birkett
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tate, C Nall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez-Ramirez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv01412
Plaintiff:
Joel Jimenez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
