Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Schwartz v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
as 1:2013cv00057
Defendant:
Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Arp v. Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
as 4:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Julie Katherine Arp
Defendant:
Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Schur v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03408
Plaintiff:
Nakita Schur
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc, N.V. Organon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKinney v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00685
Plaintiff:
Carlene McKinney
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dunne v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
Autumn Dunne
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp., N.V. Organon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Endsley v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 5:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Jincy Endsley
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sedatol v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 6:2012cv02115
Plaintiff:
Beryl Sedatol
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Warner Chilcott Sales U S L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth et al v. Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
as 4:2012cv00863
Defendant:
Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
Plaintiff:
Barbara Booth and Charles Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
as 5:2011cv02222
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Murphy
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., et al
as 3:2011cv00791
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Richmond and Bobbie Jean Wood-Estes
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
