Cases 61 - 70 of 141
Wilson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 4:2014cv00569
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Bernard Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Williams v. Justice of Peace Princint 7 et al
as 4:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jenene Williams
Defendant:
Justice of Peace Princint 7, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Branston Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Gray et al
as 4:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joyce Gray, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Northern Insurance Company of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Robbins v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 7:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Robbins
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA , Lynne Holiday, Laura Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Baird v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 5:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Baird
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cavinder et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Mortgage Servicer et al
as 4:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dan Cavinder and Cleta Cavinder
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
