Cases 61 - 70 of 510
MidFirst Bank v. Robinson et al
as 4:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
Curtis Jerome Robinson, Nicole Michelle Robinson, Ella Shaw As Legal Guardian Of Minor T.M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodriguez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Rodriguez, Jesus Nevarez, Adrian Garcia Perez and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Marquez-Calzadilla
as 22-50630
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gilberto Marquez-Calzadilla
Marquez v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 3:2022cv01495
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Marquez
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Marquez v. Tim Manh Ngo
as 7:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jose N. Marquez
Defendant:
Tim Manh Ngo D/B/A Mason Trucking and Tim Manh Ngo doing business as Mason Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Newman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2022cv01649
Plaintiff:
LaTorrence Torell Newman
Defendant:
Rodger Bowers, Julia Rodriguez, Marlen Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2022cv00146
Petitioner:
Pedro Marquez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos Marquez v. Garland
as 22-60241
Petitioner:
Henry Pablo Ramos Marquez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Marquez v. Quiktrip Corporation
as 4:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
HILDA ELIZABETH MARQUEZ
Defendant:
QUIKTRIP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
