Cases 61 - 70 of 85
v. In Re Mexico/U.S. Treaty
as 3:2012mc00187
In Re:
Hector Aceves-Cruz, Juan Manuel Aguirre-Flores, Pedro Aguirre-Leon and others
Defendant:
Nestor Calderon-Cervantes
USA v. Jose Quintana-Sepulveda
as 12-50429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE GUADAL QUINTANA-SEPULVEDA, also known as Jose Sepulveda
USA v. Roberto Mora-Sepulveda
as 11-51114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO MORA-SEPULVEDA, also known as Walter Nunez, also known as Tulio Ochoa Torres, also known as Robert Sepulveda Mora
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10783
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sepulveda v. Warehouse Rack Company, LP et al
as 4:2011cv02319
Plaintiff:
Benito Sepulveda
Defendant:
Warehouse Rack Company, LP and Carlos Rivera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
United States of America v. Sepulveda
as 5:2011mc00455
Respondent:
Fernando Sepulveda
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Sepulveda et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation
as 5:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Brian Sepulveda
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sepulveda v. Thaler
as 6:2011cv00051
Petitioner:
Carlos Andres Sepulveda
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maria De Jesus Garcia, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-40028
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
HAGGARD LAW FIRM, P.A.
Intervenor - Appellant:
MICHAEL FLANAGAN, ELOY SEPULVEDA and SEAN CALLAGY
USA v. Jose Villega
as 10-20823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE VALDEZ VILLEGAS, also known as Beldo Villegas, also known as Roy Salas, also known as Jose Valdez, also known as Jose Valdez Villegas, also known as Roy Villa, also known as Jose Vela, also known as Jose Valdez-Sepulveda, also known as Jose Valdez Se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
