Cases 71 - 80 of 147
Hill v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Amanda Jean Hill
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burns (Sloma) et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 3:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Burns (Sloma) and Joseph Burns
Defendant:
Regions Bank and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor et al v. Goodrich Petroleum Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Ronny Taylor , Ronald L. Taylor, Jr. , E. R. Ray Netterville and others
Defendant:
Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Goodrich Petroleum Company LLC and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. City of Pearl, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00646
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harris
Defendant:
City of Pearl, Mississippi , Joel Houston , Jeff Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eady v. Penn's Fish House, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
Amanda Eady
Defendant:
Penn's Fish House, Inc., Penn's Lakeland, LLC and Penn's Catering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Byrd v. Arlington Properties, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00460
Plaintiff:
Amandia Byrd
Defendant:
Arlington Properties, Inc. , Amanda Garner , Hope Kendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slaughter v. Universal Am Can Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Amanda Slaughter
Defendant:
Universal Am Can Ltd. and George L. Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lofton v. Walsh et al
as 4:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lofton
Defendant:
Nicholas Walsh and City of Clarksdale, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
