Cases 71 - 80 of 304
McMinn v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Martha McMinn
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc. , Judy Vail , Woods Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bordley v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, PNS Stores Inc and Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicole Bordley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lari v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01216
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Lari
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00208
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Soledad L. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
John Johnson, et al v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 09-30721
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN JOHNSON and ROBERT CHARLES BURDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
In re: Big Lots Stores, Inc., et al
as 09-30716
Petitioner:
In re: BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KIMBERLY ADAMS, HERBERT E. ALEXANDER, JR., PAMELA J. ALONSO and others
Fortune-Jones v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05018
Plaintiff:
Robin R. Fortune-Jones, Robin R. Fortune-Jones and Robin R. Fortune-Jones
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
White v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05127
Plaintiff:
Tim D. White, Tim D. White and Tim D. White
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Adams v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05041
Plaintiff:
Kimberly G. Adams, Kimberly G. Adams and Kimberly G. Adams
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mallady v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05060
Plaintiff:
Retta K. Mallady, Retta K. Mallady and Retta K. Mallady
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
