Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 716
Flores-Lira v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00112
Petitioner: Juan Antonio Flores-Lira
Respondent: Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benitez-Bustos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00108
Petitioner: Efrain Benitez-Bustos
Respondent: Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valenzuela v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00110
Plaintiff: Roberto Guerrero-Valenzuela
Defendant: Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Douglas Colares-Pacheco v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60780
Petitioner: DOUGLAS TAMEIRAO COLARES-PACHECO
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mayra Machado v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60781
Petitioner: MAYRA JACKELINE MACHADO
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dennis Jimenez-Padilla v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-60782
Petitioner: DENNIS JIMENEZ-PADILLA, also known as Javier Anionio Monge
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mohamed Yussuf v. Bret Johnson
as 16-20770
Petitioner - Appellant: MOHAMED ABDI YUSSUF
Respondent - Appellee: BRET A. JOHNSON, Acting United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Officer Director - Houston Division and LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Neville Lyimo v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-60783
Petitioner: NEVILLE LYIMO
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jorge Almazan-Martinez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60779
Petitioner: JORGE OMAR ALMAZAN-MARTINEZ
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kamran Ahmed v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-60775
Petitioner: KAMRAN AHMED
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?