Cases 81 - 90 of 159
Gillie v. Brooks et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Clarence Roosevelt Gillie
Defendant:
Brooks, Timothy Outlaw, Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Robinson
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Crawson Unknown, Jason Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , State of MS Department of Corrections, Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumrall v. Davis et al
as 4:2016cv00047
Petitioner:
Derrick Sumrall
Respondent:
Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray-Ray, John Doe Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Keith La-Dale Porter
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, Brian Ladner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahl v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
James Paul Dahl
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jacqueline Banks, Marshall Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mouton v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Marco Mouton
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Hubert Davis and Darlene Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Curtis Chrishaun Evans
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Unknown Smith and Unknown Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salter v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
William Salter
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Marshall Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumrall v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00034
Petitioner:
Derrick Sumrall
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher, Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
