Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00694
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01437
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Texas Board of Pardons
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Layton
as 6:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Sergeant FNU Layton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Central Grievance Office et al
as 6:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Central Grievance Office, Captain FNU Defoor, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gordon et al
as 6:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Athony Gordon, Central Grievance Office, Mike Ptasiensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Law Library McConnell Unit, Central Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Law Library McConnell Unit, Central Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Shelby et al
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Tammy Shelby, Michael Carvajal, Mike Piasiensk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
