Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ali et al v. H.W. Lochner, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Anum Sadruddin Ali, Kulsumben Karowadia, Simi Altaf Kasowadia and others
Defendant:
H.W. Lochner, Inc. and Robert Cagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Carvalho v. IM Retailers, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Allen Carvalho
Defendant:
IM Retailers, LLC, IM Retailers 2, LLC, Altaf Jindani and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
D'Costa v. IM Retailers, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv04030
Plaintiff:
Joye DCosta and Joye D'Costa
Defendant:
IM Retailers, LLC, IM Retailers 2, LLC, Altaf Jindani and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Altaf v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 1:2020cv00105
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Altaf
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Badal v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00603
Plaintiff:
Altaf Badal
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc. and Shawn Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osorio v. Alvani Investments, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv01867
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Osorio
Defendant:
Alvani Investments, LLC and Altaf A. Alvani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Kasowadia et al v. Willis et al
as 4:2012cv01350
Plaintiff:
Altaf Kurbanali Kasowadia , Simi Altaf Kurbanali Kasowadia and Yam Standard Food Market
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack and Don Willis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
WMS Gaming Inc., v. VIP Slot Distributors Inc., et al
as 4:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
WMS Gaming Inc.
Defendant:
VIP Slot Distributors Inc. and Altaf K Makanojiya
Objector:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
