Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gill v. Alexander
as 23-10843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Defendant / Appellee:
Wade Alexander, Jordan Unit Assistant Warden, Antonious Flanagan, Captain, Carlos Mendoza, Lieutenant and others
Rudolfo Gill v. Charlene Crockett, et al
as 20-50582
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Gutierrez, Correctional Officer, Kimbery Grist, Correctional Officer IV, Ms. Pepi, Correctional Officer V and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Gill v. Alexander et al
as 2:2020cv00115
Respondent:
Kailey Smiles, Ms. FNU Murrack, Robert D Coffey and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gil v. Crockett et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Unknown Black Female Lt., Jeremy Chance, Latisha Baraka and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza et al v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 7:2014cv00496
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mendoza and Lorena Mendoza
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Tiffiney Eades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ezequiel Lopez-Hernandez
as 13-40727
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EZEQUIEL LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Juan Carlos Mendoza
Mendoza v. Forward Air, Inc.
as 7:2013cv00090
Defendant:
Forward Air, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Perez v Mendoza Hernandez D/B/A M.H. Cruces Internacional and Alma Marcela De Luna Martinez
as 2:2012cv00031
Defendant:
Alma Marcela De Luna Martinez and Jose Carlos Mendoza Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Adrian Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Case name not on file
as 3:2011mc00483
In Re:
Martha Barraza-Aguirre, Oscar Ceballos, Rene Chavarin-Carrillo and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Mendoza et al
as 7:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Carlos Mendoza, Perla Mendoza, Sylvia Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
