Cases 1 - 10 of 248
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bownes v. Hood et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey, Raymond Byrd and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 3:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Cleveland E. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Shannon Warnock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Bryant et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barabour, Tamara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedgeworth v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00730
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, M.D.O.C., Christopher B. Epps and others
Plaintiff:
Wiley Wedgeworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Bryant et al
as 3:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Christopher B. Epps, Phillip Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lafayette v. Epps et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lafayette
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, David Petrie, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Brady et al
as 4:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Louis David Brown
Defendant:
Vanita Brady, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
