Cases 1 - 10 of 629
Fischer v. Dinges et al
as 4:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Fischer
Defendant:
Dan O. Dinges, Scott C. Schroeder, Phillip L. Stalnaker and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gleeson v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Dan Gleeson
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Hearon et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Dan Hearon, Geri Sherwood and Kylin Smith
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Rayford
as 4:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Century Surety Company v. Carriage Place Apartments Houston, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Century Surety Company
Defendant:
Carriage Place Apartments Houston, LLC, Texas Commercial Insurance Specialists MGR LLC f/k/a Texas Commercial Insurance Specialists, Inc., Dan Kaderka, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ispas et al v. Emmel et al
as 4:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Mihai Dan Ispas, Anca Ispas, Alexandru Ispas and others
Defendant:
CHIEF IIPO ALISSA EMMEL, UR M. JADDOU and Alissa Emmel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Stewart v. Rayford
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
