Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Davis v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
David J. Davis
Defendant:
Brian Collier, C.F. Hazzlewood, Karen Acosta and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
David J. Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00497
Petitioner:
David J. Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Davis v. Cheryl Kyle
as 10-40085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. DAVIS, also known as Thunder Cloud Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAIRE RUSSELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Thunder Davis v. Cheryl Kyle, et al
as 09-40722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THUNDER CLOUD DAVIS, also known as David J. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL KYLE, KEN E KUYKENDALL and UNKNOWN UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH EMPLOYEE
David Davis v. Delarosa, et al
as 09-40499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DELAROSA, Sergeant, HILL, Officer, CONCABA, Sergeant and others
Davis v. Delarosa, et al
as 08-41329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY JOHNSON, Texas Prison Director, JOSE DELAROSA, Sergeant, HILL, Corrections Officer and others
Davis v. Kyle, et al
as 08-40530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. DAVIS, also known as Thunder Cloud Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL KYLE, KEN E KUYKENDALL, TITO ORIG and others
Davis v. Fieldstone Mortgage Company
as 4:2007cv01726
Defendant:
Fieldstone Mortgage Company
Plaintiff:
David J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
