Cases 1 - 10 of 497
Dominguez et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Juana Dominguez and Raul Dominguez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Herrera v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Lorenza E. Dominguez Herrera
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hernandez Dominguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Gabino Hernandez Dominguez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Unidentified Corrections Officer et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christopher Rios
Defendant:
Unidentified Corrections Officer, U.T.M.B Dominguez State Jail Staff, TDCJ Dominguez State Jail Prison Unit Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Arnett v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L Arnett
Defendant:
Mike Griffith, Officer Doe #1, Guard Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Norma Dominguez
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
