Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Flores v. Madrigal et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jose Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Judge Melissa Madrigal, Linda Schaure and Bobby Galvan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Nueces Co Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jose Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Nueces Co Jail, Robstown Police Dept, Judge Melissa Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Felipe Flores-Sifuente
as 18-50350
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIPE FLORES-SIFUENTES
In re: Felipe Flores-Sifuente
as 18-50263
Petitioner:
In re: FELIPE FLORES-SIFUENTES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Flores v. Davis
as 1:2016cv01160
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Juan Felipe Flores
Respondent:
Judge Oscar J. Hale, Jr. and Paul Thomson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Edward L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Thomson et al
as 1:2016cv01159
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Judge Oscar J. Hale, Jr. and Paul Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. William Stephens
as 1:2016cv00526
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Oscar J Hale, Jr, Paul Thomson and Webb County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Webb County et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE TRANSFERRED TO WDTX
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Webb County, Paul Thomson and Oscar J Hale, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Felipe Flores-Sifuente
as 12-51145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIPE FLORES-SIFUENTES
Flores v. T.D.C.J. or employees et al
as 5:2010cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jose Felipe Flores
Defendant:
T.D.C.J. or employees and U.T.M.B. Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
