Cases 1 - 10 of 2,313
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Carroll Independent School District
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lopez-Sierra v. Garland
as 24-60241
Petitioner:
Rene Alejandro Lopez-Sierra
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Singh v. Garland
as 24-60237
Petitioner:
Davinder Singh
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Diaz-Menendez v. Garland
as 24-60232
Petitioner:
Margarita Diaz-Menendez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
