Cases 1 - 10 of 248
Planet Home Lending, LLC v. McDonald et al
as 4:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Planet Home Lending, LLC
Defendant:
Adrianne Todman, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, John Walker, Jr, Clifford McDonald, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Brown et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Plaintiff:
BRIGID SHEA, in her official capacity as Travis County Commissioner, ANN HOWARD, in her official capacity as Travis County Commissioner, MARGARET GMEZ, in her official capacity as Travis County Commissioner and others
Defendant:
KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Texas Attorney General and JANE NELSON, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The State of Texas v. Elfant et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Defendant:
BRIGID SHEA, in her official capacity as Travis County Commissioner, ANDY BROWN, in his official capacity as Travis County Judge, MARGARET GOMEZ, in her official capacity as Travis County Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABM Industry Groups, LLC v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 4:2024cv03353
Defendant:
Julie Su (in Official Capacity as Acting Secretary of Labor), Willow Eden Fort (in her official capacity as an Administrative Law Judge of the U.S. Dept.of Labor), United States Department of Labor and others
Plaintiff:
ABM Industry Groups, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, MELANIE FONTES RAINER, in her official capacity as Director of the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
American Association of Ancillary Benefits v. Becerra, et al.
as 4:2024cv00783
Defendant:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary Department of Labor, Janet Yellen, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury and Xavier Becerra
Plaintiff:
American Association of Ancillary Benefits, A Florida Not-for-Profit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Harris v. Carlson
as 4:2024cv00737
Respondent:
Krissy Y. Carlson, in her official capacity as Director of Industry Operations, Dallas Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Petitioner:
Thomas Roy Harris, Jr., d/b/a Sporting Arms Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (B) Agency Action Review
State of Texas v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2024cv00171
Defendant:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services;, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ancar v. M/V YANGZE 7 et al
as 4:2024cv02739
Defendant:
Shanghai Run Yuan Shipping Management Co., Ltd., Yangzijiang Shipping Pte. Ltd., M/V YANGZE 7 and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ancar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Houston Fleeting Services LLC v. M/V YANGZE, her engines, tackle, apparel, bunkers, etc., in rem et al
as 4:2024cv02705
Defendant:
Ladon Shipping Pte. Ltd., Yangzijiang Shipping Pte. Ltd., Shanghai Run Yuan Shipping Management Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Fleeting Services LLC and Houston Fleeting Services LLC
Counter-Claimant:
Karribian Scott
Claimant:
Karribian Scott
Counter-Defendant:
Ladon Shipping Pte. Ltd., Yangzijiang Shipping Pte. Ltd., Shanghai Run Yuan Shipping Management Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
