Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Washington v. Beaumont Bone & Joint et al
as 1:2026cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Defendant:
Beaumont Bone & Joint, Oscar Currie, A. Lynd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00503
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 7:2026cv00135
Plaintiff:
Karen Ramos and Luis Ramos
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv00356
Plaintiff:
Norvell Lamont Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, FNU Cox, Dr. Luis Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Reid v. Dobbs
as 9:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schaefer v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Dobbs, FNU Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Denton v. Well Path et al
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Ricky Denton
Defendant:
Well Path and Luis Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
