Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Beaumont Lamar Apartments, LLC v. Wallis Bank et al
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Beaumont Lamar Apartments, LLC and Beaumont Lamar Apartments LLC
Defendant:
Wallis Bank, Musa Dakri, Asif Dakri and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCune et al v. Zhongyiqun
as 4:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Ted McCune, F4PS LLC and Ted (George) McCune
Defendant:
Zhongyiqun
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Johnson v. Chesapeake Louisiana
as 22-30302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Johnson, Linda Johnson, Donald A. Crosslin, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. and Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C.
Johnson v. Chesapeake Louisiana
as 22-90020
Petitioner:
Allen Johnson, Linda Johnson, Donald A. Crosslin, Jr. and others
Respondent:
Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. and Chesapeake Operating, L.L.C.
McCune et al v. Shenzhen Shangfeng Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Ted McCune and F4PS LLC
Defendant:
Shenzhen Shangfeng Electronics Co., Ltd. doing business as Javoco doing business as Javoco-US
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McCune et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv01341
Defendant:
Lonestar West Enterprises, LLC, Justin Johnson and Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc
Plaintiff:
Wayne Jordan and Allen McCune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCune et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv01927
Defendant:
Justin Johnson and Lonestar West Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Wayne Jordan and Allen McCune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher McCuneIn re: Christopher McCune
as 20-60136
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER O'NEIL MCCUNE
Christopher McCuneIn re: Christopher McCune
as 19-60876
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER O'NEIL MCCUNE
Christopher McCune v. Joann Shivers, Warden, et al
as 19-60470
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent and JOANN SHIVERS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER O'NEIL MCCUNE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
