Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brantley v. Novak et al
as 2:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tammy Brantley
Defendant:
Paul Novak and John and Jane Does Persons and Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shah Gazi Investments, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
Shah Gazi Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Novak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Galeas v. Novak et al
as 3:2009cv00726
Plaintiff:
Clara Galeas
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Janet Napolitano and Eric H Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Romero-Martinez v. Novak et al
as 3:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramon Romero-Martinez
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Michael Chertoff and Michael B Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rios v. Novak et al
as 3:2008cv00818
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Rios
Defendant:
Paul Novak, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and Michael B Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores v. Novak et al
as 3:2008cv00206
Plaintiff:
Christian Ramon Flores
Defendant:
Paul Novak, Michael Chertoff and Michael B Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Goldschmidt v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ayalla Goldschmidt
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Emilio T Gonzales, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
