Cases 1 - 10 of 309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Haraburde v. Parking Revenue Recovery Services Inc
as 3:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
David Haraburde
Defendant:
Parking Revenue Recovery Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Legacy Recovery Svc v. City of Monroe
as 24-30211
Plaintiff:
Legacy Recovery Service, L.L.C., doing business as Legacy House, Colburn Sullivan, Joe Montgomery and others
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Friday Ellis, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Monroe, City Council of Monroe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alkhalili v. Piscitelli et al
as 4:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Anamilena Alkhalili
Defendant:
Louis Piscitelli, American Recovery Services, I.R. Services Property Redemption and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
