Cases 1 - 5 of 5
St. Bernard Parish et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 2:2018cv05222
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company , Bepco, LP , Chevron USA Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
St. Bernard Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources , Thomas F. Harris and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
St. Bernard Parish v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 2:2016cv16294
Plaintiff:
St. Bernard Parish
Intervenor:
Attorney General State of Louisiana and Department of Natural Resources State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company , Apache Corporation , BEPCO, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Bd Cmsnr SE LA Flood Protc, et al v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., et al
as 15-30162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKE BORGNE BASIN LEVEE DISTRICT, ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, EAST JEFFERSON LEVEE DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BOPCO, L.P., WILLIAMS EXPLORATION COMPANY, J. M. HUBER CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bd Cmsnr SE LA Flood Protc, et al v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., et al
as 15-30162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA FLOOD PROTECTION AUTHORITY - EAST, ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, LAKE BORGNE BASIN LEVEE DISTRICT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNEESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C., ALTA MESA SERVICES, L.P., ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE, L.L.C. and others
Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority - East et al v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05410
Plaintiff:
Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority - East , Orleans Levee District , Lake Borgne Basin Levee District and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC , Alta Mesa Services, LP , Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
