Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sharma et al v. VisionWorks of America, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
saurav sharma, diane young, jaime stieve and others
Defendant:
VisionWorks of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire and Electronic Communications Interception
Sharma et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Rijan Sharma and Jenisha Oli
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Convextech, Inc. v. Atharva Technology Ltd et al
as 4:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
Convextech, Inc.
Defendant:
Atharva Technology Ltd, Sanjay Sharma and Softcom Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diaz et al v. Sharma et al
as 5:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Lilia Diaz and Steve Herrera
Defendant:
Karan Sharma and GPEX Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
