Cases 1 - 10 of 5,724
Hollin v. Isom et al
as 4:2024cv00895
Defendant:
Michael J. Embler, American Airlines Group, Inc., Denise M. O'Leary and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hollin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03548
Petitioner:
Rayford Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gentry v. SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv01062
Defendant:
ICU Medical, Inc., SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. and SMITHS MEDICAL MD, INC.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Kelli Bendette Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02361
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Notice of Removal of Criminal Prosecution
v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Aafia Siddiqui
Defendant:
Michael Smith, FNU Daniels, FNU McCullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
M&T Bank v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00228
Defendant:
Teresa Rowell, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and Joshua Smith
Plaintiff:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv02339
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Felicia Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00153
Respondent:
B Williams
Petitioner:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv01092
Defendant:
RPM Dining, LLC doing business as The Yellow Rose, Jane Doe 2, Joanna Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson Bradley and Smith Calvin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
