Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Teladoc, Inc. et al v. Texas Medical Board, et al
as 1:2015cv00343
Amicu:
American Osteopathic Association, Federation of State Medical Boards, William L. High and others
Defendant:
Michael Arambula, Julie K. Attebury, Manuel G. Guajardo and others
Plaintiff:
Emmette A. Clark, Kyon Hood, Teladoc Physicians, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
McCord v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
Michael D McCord
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Texas Medical Association Insurance Trust
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Walker v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2009cv03512
Plaintiff:
Randall Walker
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Texas Medical Association Insurance Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Walker v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2009cv00380
Plaintiff:
Randall Walker
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Texas Medical Association Insurance Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Watson et al v. Hortman et al
as 2:2008cv00081
Defendant:
Gregory Hortman, Carl Turner, Gulf Coast Cancer & Diagnostic Center at South East Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Watson, Adriane Springs, Dianne Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
