Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Beaumont Lamar Apartments, LLC v. Wallis Bank et al
as 4:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Beaumont Lamar Apartments, LLC and Beaumont Lamar Apartments LLC
Defendant:
Wallis Bank, Musa Dakri, Asif Dakri and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gonzales v. Petterson et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Defendant:
Mallory Petterson, Benjamin Lodi, Jaime Blaunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Klein et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Felix Klein, Scot Say, NFN Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Balderas et al
as 5:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Defendant:
Manuel Balderas, Jaime Ortiz, Andy Vaneleave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corson v. Petterson et al
as 5:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Vincent Corson
Defendant:
Jesus M. Peralta and Sylvia L. Petterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corson v. Peralta et al
as 5:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Vincent Corson
Defendant:
Jesus M. Peralta, Lorraine C. Salas and Laura A. Torres
Consol Defendant:
Sylvia L. Petterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petterson v. PNC Bank National Association
as 3:2013cv01331
Defendant:
PNC Bank National Association and Efurd Properties LLC
Plaintiff:
Nancy J Petterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Petterson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03063
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Scott C. Petterson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
