Cases 11 - 20 of 635
Bernard Howard v. Dale Collins, et al
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HOWARD
Defendant:
REGINALD HARVEL, DALE COLLINS, WILLIAM RICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nathan Ling v. Campbell County, TN, et al
as 24-5051
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LING
Defendant:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, TN, et al. and DAKOTA WILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacities
William Griffin, Jr., et al v. Scott Hunter, et al
as 24-5004
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GRIFFIN, JR. and P & G CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS LLC
Defendant:
SERGEANT SCOTT HUNTER, CHARLES TROTTER, LIEUTENANT SHAWN WILLIAMS and others
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agness McCurry v. Travis McDonough, et al
as 23-6055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, Judge, KENNY W. ARMSTRONG, Judge, ANDY D. BENNETT, Judge and others
Victor Couzens, et al v. City of Forest Park, OH, et al
as 23-3930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASTOR VICTOR S. COUZENS
Plaintiff:
INSPIRATIONAL BIBLE CHURCH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FOREST PARK, OH, COLONEL WILLIAM ARNS, In his official capacity, REBECCA EAVERS, In her official and personal capacities and others
Tate Prows v. City of Oxford, OH, et al
as 23-3920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATE DAVID PROWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OXFORD, OH, CHIEF JOHN A. JONES, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Harbor Hawk Seawall, LLC, et al v. Bayou Meadows II Condominium Association, et al
as 23-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARBOR HAWK SEAWALL, LLC and WILLIAM AMEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BAYOU MEADOWS II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and WILLIAM C. BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
