Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Farris Morris v. Bruce Westbrook
as 16-6661
Petitioner - Appellant:
FARRIS GENNER MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
BRUCE WESTBROOKS, Warden
Doylan Rivers v. Neil Turner, et al
as 16-4241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOYLAN V. RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEIL TURNER, in his individual and official capacity as Warden of NCCC, BLAKE HUNT, in his individual capacity, [UNKNOWN] SHAEFFER, in their individual capacity and others
James Morris v. Myron Batt
as 16-5674
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MYRON L. BATTS
Morris Weatherspoon v. Barbara Bein, et al
as 16-1366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA BEIN, Physician Assistant, KEVIN MURPHY, Dentist, CATHY WEAVER, Hygienist and others
Morris Weatherspoon v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 16-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, UNKNOWN BRONTOWSKI, UNKNOWN BRAND, Physician Assistant and others
Meechee Morris v. Willie Smith
as 16-1108
Petitioner - Appellant:
MEECHEE MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE SMITH, Warden
Morris Hall, Jr. v. USA
as 15-6372
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS E. HALL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morris Weatherspoon v. Denise Toner, et al
as 15-2446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE L. TONER, Dentist, UNKNOWN WINKLER, Doctor / Dentist, UNKNOWN CLIFFORD, Dentist and others
Morris Weatherspoon v. Surjit Dinsa, et al
as 15-2389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
SURJIT DINSA, Psychiatrist, JOHN KORNOWSKI, Phychologist, MCGUIRE, Nurse and others
Morris Weatherspoon v. Susan George, et al
as 15-2304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN GEORGE, Psychiatrist, Macomb Correctional Facility, JON PAVITT, Dental Hygienist, Macomb Correctional Facility, GAIL WANG, Dentist, Macomb Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
