Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Steven Peterson v. J.C. Holland
as 16-6121
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN DESMOND PETERSON
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND, Warden
Bobby Hazel v. J.C. Holland
as 16-5663
Petitioner - Appellant: BOBBY E. HAZEL
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND, Warden
Michael Terrelonge v. J.C. Holland
as 16-5364
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL GENE TERRELONGE
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND, Warden
Derek Lucas v. J.C. Holland
as 16-5351
Petitioner - Appellant: DEREK LUCAS
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND, Warden
Gary Williams v. J.C. Holland
as 15-6423
Petitioner - Appellant: GARY L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND, Warden
Lee Ely, et al v. City of Dayton, Tennessee, et al
as 15-6115
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEE ELY, individually and surviving spouse and next of kin of Penny Christine and CHARLES NELSON
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF DAYTON, TENNESSEE, J.C. BYRD, in his individual and official capacity, BRUCE SPRADLING, in his individual and official capacity and others
Kevin Dann v. USP-McCreary Health Adm., et al
as 15-6017
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN DANN
Defendant: USP-MCCREARY HEALTH ADM., USP-McCreary Remedies Relief Adm. and J.C. HOLLAND, Warden
Defendant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, USP-McCreary Care Provider and JUDE ONUOHU, USP-McCreary Acting Physician
Marshay Preston v. J.C. Holland
as 15-5602
Petitioner - Appellant: MARSHAY PRESTON
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND, USP - McCreary
Donna Soltis v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONNA SOLTIS
Defendant - Appellee: J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC. and BRIAN APSEY
Rajul Ruhbayan v. J.C. Holland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-5322
Petitioner - Appellant: RAJUL RUHBAYAN
Respondent - Appellee: J.C. HOLLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?