Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Ken Lick Coal Company, et al v. OWCP, et al
as 23-3738
Petitioner:
KEN LICK COAL COMPANY and AMERICAN RESOURCES CORPORATION
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BOB REED and BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
USA v. Jason Reed
as 23-1810
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON WILLIAM REED
Patrick Reed v. Harold May
as 23-3686
Petitioner / Appellant:
PATRICK D. REED
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN HAROLD MAY
USA v. Earnest Reed
as 23-1725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EARNEST BENARD REED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Darell Reed
as 23-1055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARELL DAVIE REED
USA v. Jason Reed
as 22-1850
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON WILLIAM REED
Kevin Koelzer v. Aaron Westrick, et al
as 22-1835
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEVIN KOELZER
Defendant / Appellant:
EVAN SAXE, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity, MICHAEL REED, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity, COLE HOYER, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
AARON WESTRICK, Grand Rapids Police Officer, in his individual capacity, AUSTIN DIEKEVERS, GREGG ARSENAULT and others
Robert Reed v. Campbell County, KY, et al
as 22-5781
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT SEAN REED
Defendant:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, KY
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICER MICHAEL RAY CURTIS and OFFICER KYLE G. GRAY
Robert Reed v. Campbell County, KY, et al
as 22-5751
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT SEAN REED
Defendant:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, KY
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICER MICHAEL RAY CURTIS and OFFICER KYLE G. GRAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
